Author summary
36% 1 analyzed article/video 7,759 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vanda Felbab-Brown results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Slippery Slope , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 1,871 hits . Analysis detected 15,251 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 16% (7,786 of 9,210 authors). This Vanda Felbab-Brown is better (less manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group. Vanda Felbab-Brown
Author details
Total words: 31,036
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.5% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles31K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.0% 0.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst