Topic summary
83% 8 analyzed articles/videos 1,449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foreign Exchange results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 631 hits . Analysis detected 7,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,760 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 63% (8,744 of 23,637 topics). This Foreign Exchange is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Foreign Exchange
Topic details
Total words: 7,760
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.0% percentile 3.0% BS Score8 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.1% 6.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Recency Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst