Author summary
88%24 analyzed articles/videos1,757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kazuaki Nagata results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 1,948 hits. Analysis detected 18,328 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,768 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 66% (3,168 of 9,091 authors). This Kazuaki Nagata is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Kazuaki Nagata
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
66%Kazuaki Nagata (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 16,768
Article count: 24
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

65% percentile
025507510065.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score24 analyzed articles16.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.6%11.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.2%9.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.8%9.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 7.4%7.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.4%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate