Topic summary
34% 13 analyzed articles/videos 5,826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fatal Crash results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 1,530 hits . Analysis detected 11,366 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,638 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 11% (22,077 of 24,545 topics). This Fatal Crash is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group. Fatal Crash
Topic details
Total words: 20,638
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.1% percentile 1.2% BS Score13 analyzed articles20.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst