Author summary
17% 3 analyzed articles/videos 930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Cupelli results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 231 hits . Analysis detected 1,950 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,720 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 37% (5,996 of 9,471 authors). This Matthew Cupelli is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. Matthew Cupelli
Author details
Total words: 3,720
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.7% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst