Topic summary
29% 33 analyzed articles/videos 20,121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fact Check results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 4,350 hits . Analysis detected 48,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 87,930 analyzed words across 33 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 6% (22,499 of 23,763 topics). This Fact Check is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group. Fact Check
Topic details
Total words: 87,930
Article count: 33
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.3% percentile 1.1% BS Score33 analyzed articles87.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst