Author summary
â 22% 9 analyzed articles/videos 4,764 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna RascouĂ«t-Paz results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 1,220 hits . Analysis detected 11,357 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,223 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of â 6% (8,033 of 8,526 authors). This Anna RascouĂ«t-Paz is better (less manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group. Anna RascouĂ«t-Paz
Author details
Total words: 23,223
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.8% percentile 1.0% BS Score9 analyzed articles23.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst