Topic summary
⁠75%2 analyzed articles/videos2,417 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Existentialism results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,325 hits. Analysis detected 8,589 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,668 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (14,363 of 22,261 topics). This Existentialism is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Existentialism
Topic details
Total words: 9,668
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.5% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.7%13.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.9%9.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos