Author summary
85% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,732 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Hill results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Hindsight Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 2,946 hits . Analysis detected 14,155 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,992 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 60% (3,443 of 8,610 authors). This Mark Hill is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group. Mark Hill
Author details
Total words: 10,992
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.0% percentile 2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles11K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 26.8% 26.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 6.7% 6.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.8% 12.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 20.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.4% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst