Topic summary
71% 29 analyzed articles/videos 30,869 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Executive Power results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 19,041 hits . Analysis detected 122,795 faulty-reasoning hits from 127,575 analyzed words across 29 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 32% (16,714 of 24,545 topics). This Executive Power is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group. Executive Power
Topic details
Total words: 127,575
Article count: 29
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score29 analyzed articles127.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst