Topic summary
⁠21%2 analyzed articles/videos1,960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Stewardship results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 391 hits. Analysis detected 3,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,840 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (21,331 of 24,545 topics). This Environmental Stewardship is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
Environmental Stewardship
Topic details
Total words: 7,840
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510013.1% percentile
1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos