Topic summary
87% 28 analyzed articles/videos 22,074 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Science results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 6,050 hits . Analysis detected 68,549 faulty-reasoning hits from 106,530 analyzed words across 28 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 11% (20,383 of 22,896 topics). This Environmental Science is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group. Environmental Science
Topic details
Total words: 106,530
Article count: 28
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.0% percentile 1.3% BS Score28 analyzed articles106.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst