Topic summary
76% 17 analyzed articles/videos 20,331 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electoral Politics results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 8,971 hits . Analysis detected 81,768 faulty-reasoning hits from 84,734 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 32% (16,375 of 23,962 topics). This Electoral Politics is better (less manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group. Electoral Politics
Topic details
Total words: 84,734
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.7% percentile 1.8% BS Score17 analyzed articles84.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst