Author summary
68% 1 analyzed article/video 1,792 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Zaretsky results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 770 hits . Analysis detected 3,640 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,376 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 66% (3,132 of 9,017 authors). This Robert Zaretsky is worse (more manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group. Robert Zaretsky
Author details
Total words: 5,376
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.7% 8.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Horn Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst