Topic summary
95%4 analyzed articles/videos4,192 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Warfare results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 1,959 hits. Analysis detected 20,976 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,768 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 62% (9,295 of 23,944 topics). This Economic Warfare is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Economic Warfare
Topic details
Total words: 16,768
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.7%11.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.7%6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.2%7.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate