Topic summary
80% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,589 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Theory results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,420 hits . Analysis detected 9,757 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,356 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 42% (14,281 of 24,587 topics). This Economic Theory is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group. Economic Theory
Topic details
Total words: 10,356
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst