Author summary
79% 2 analyzed articles/videos 957 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eva Roytburg results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 600 hits . Analysis detected 3,799 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,828 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,782 of 8,940 authors). This Eva Roytburg is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group. Eva Roytburg
Author details
Total words: 3,828
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.9% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.7% 15.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Circular Reasoning: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst