Topic summary
87% 23 analyzed articles/videos 5,932 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dodgers results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , In-Group Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 3,601 hits . Analysis detected 28,773 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,373 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 46% (12,142 of 22,481 topics). This Dodgers is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group. Dodgers
Topic details
Total words: 24,373
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score23 analyzed articles24.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst