Author summary
96% 15 analyzed articles/videos 19,313 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Javier Cabral results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 9,541 hits . Analysis detected 87,630 faulty-reasoning hits from 66,016 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 57% (3,712 of 8,570 authors). This Javier Cabral is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group. Javier Cabral
Author details
Total words: 66,016
Article count: 15
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.7% percentile 2.5% BS Score15 analyzed articles66K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 13.0% 13.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.9% 4.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 9.0% 9.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst