Topic summary
86% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,680 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dna Evidence results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,873 hits . Analysis detected 12,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,979 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 54% (10,188 of 21,861 topics). This Dna Evidence is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group. Dna Evidence
Topic details
Total words: 12,979
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles13K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.8% 7.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst