Topic summary
92% 13 analyzed articles/videos 7,311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Disarmament results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 4,481 hits . Analysis detected 26,075 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,867 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 30% (15,845 of 22,481 topics). This Disarmament is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group. Disarmament
Topic details
Total words: 30,867
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score13 analyzed articles30.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst