Topic summary
⁠54%6 analyzed articles/videos6,163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic Socialists Of America results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 2,347 hits. Analysis detected 21,794 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,182 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (17,783 of 24,545 topics). This Democratic Socialists Of America is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Democratic Socialists Of America

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.6% percentile
1.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles25.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.3%9.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos