Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Philip Cunliffe results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 31.3% saturation with 166 hits. Analysis detected 454 faulty-reasoning hits from 530 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 8,706 authors). This Philip Cunliffe is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Philip Cunliffe
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Philip Cunliffe (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 530
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles530 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 31.3%31.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 27.2%27.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.3%4.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.8%16.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Author 31.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 27.2%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 16.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos