Topic summary
⁠6%1 analyzed article/video468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense Department Reorganization results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 261 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (12,416 of 23,445 topics). This Defense Department Reorganization is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Defense Department Reorganization
Topic details
Total words: 1,872
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–10%
0.0%2%4%6%8%10%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.8%3.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%2%2%4%4%6%6%8%8%10%10%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos