Topic summary
⁠99%4 analyzed articles/videos4,403 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cultural Appropriation results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 2,897 hits. Analysis detected 22,871 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,288 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (9,094 of 24,545 topics). This Cultural Appropriation is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Cultural Appropriation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 15,288
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 17.5%17.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.9%18.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.8%15.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos