Topic summary
⁠57%4 analyzed articles/videos2,922 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Culinary Scene results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,631 hits. Analysis detected 9,192 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,664 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (16,255 of 24,545 topics). This Culinary Scene is better (less manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
Culinary Scene
Topic details
Total words: 13,664
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos