Topic summary
59%2 analyzed articles/videos1,423 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cpu Pricing results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 601 hits. Analysis detected 4,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,692 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 44% (12,272 of 21,790 topics). This Cpu Pricing is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Cpu Pricing
Topic details
Total words: 5,692
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate