Author summary
70% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hassam Nasir results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 1,239 hits . Analysis detected 9,300 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,734 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 64% (3,116 of 8,568 authors). This Hassam Nasir is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group. Hassam Nasir
Author details
Total words: 8,734
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 14.2% 14.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.8% 4.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 14.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst