Topic summary
61% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,452 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cosmology results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 4,139 hits . Analysis detected 15,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,590 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 39% (15,092 of 24,545 topics). This Cosmology is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Cosmology
Topic details
Total words: 24,590
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles24.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst