Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,481 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Kovac results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 468 hits . Analysis detected 3,476 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,924 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 47% (4,949 of 9,209 authors). This Adam Kovac is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group. Adam Kovac
Author details
Total words: 5,924
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.9% 7.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst