Topic summary
82%1 analyzed article/video658 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Compute Power results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 31.2% saturation with 821 hits. Analysis detected 3,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,632 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 82% (4,634 of 24,545 topics). This Compute Power is worse (more manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group.
Compute Power
Topic details
Total words: 2,632
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.1% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 31.2%31.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 17.1%17.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 18.2%18.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 31.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos