Topic summary
63% 8 analyzed articles/videos 6,200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coaching results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 2,224 hits . Analysis detected 19,070 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,512 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (17,803 of 24,545 topics). This Coaching is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group. Coaching
Topic details
Total words: 22,512
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles22.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst