Author summary
0% 16 analyzed articles/videos 13,460 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trey Wallace results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 6,741 hits . Analysis detected 55,267 faulty-reasoning hits from 45,323 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 53% (4,165 of 8,788 authors). This Trey Wallace is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group. Trey Wallace
Author details
Total words: 45,323
Article count: 16
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score16 analyzed articles45.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst