Author summary
⁠67%5 analyzed articles/videos1,980 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Pantorno results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 1,526 hits. Analysis detected 8,883 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,376 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (3,829 of 9,095 authors). This Joe Pantorno is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Joe Pantorno
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠58%Joe Pantorno (selected)3%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,376
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

58% percentile
025507510057.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.5%7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.3%16.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos