Topic summary
82% 24 analyzed articles/videos 21,910 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 6,954 hits . Analysis detected 64,497 faulty-reasoning hits from 80,099 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 21% (17,583 of 22,261 topics). This City is better (less manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group. City
Topic details
Total words: 80,099
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score24 analyzed articles80.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst