Topic summary
⁠19%3 analyzed articles/videos1,450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cholesterol Management results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 212 hits. Analysis detected 2,939 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,800 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (19,289 of 24,545 topics). This Cholesterol Management is better (less manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group.
Cholesterol Management

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510021.4% percentile
1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos