Author summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 292 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlotte Grinberg results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Indoctrination , and Negativity Bias , with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 152 hits . Analysis detected 1,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,935 of 9,471 authors). This Charlotte Grinberg is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group. Charlotte Grinberg
Author details
Total words: 1,168
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.6% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 13.0% 13.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 13.0%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 11.0%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 10.4%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst