Topic summary
47%4 analyzed articles/videos1,233 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Endangerment results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 877 hits. Analysis detected 4,158 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,348 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 63% (8,917 of 23,591 topics). This Child Endangerment is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group.
Child Endangerment
Topic details
Total words: 5,348
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate