Topic summary
78% 6 analyzed articles/videos 712 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrity Gossip results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 1,871 hits . Analysis detected 12,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,970 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 50% (11,776 of 23,197 topics). This Celebrity Gossip is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group. Celebrity Gossip
Topic details
Total words: 11,970
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles12K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.6% 15.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst