Topic summary
89% 10 analyzed articles/videos 10,178 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cannabis Industry results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 4,960 hits . Analysis detected 24,985 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,620 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 27% (16,417 of 22,488 topics). This Cannabis Industry is better (less manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group. Cannabis Industry
Topic details
Total words: 33,620
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score10 analyzed articles33.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst