Topic summary
56% 8 analyzed articles/videos 5,720 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Building Safety results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 2,979 hits . Analysis detected 18,645 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,688 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 28% (16,045 of 22,261 topics). This Building Safety is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group. Building Safety
Topic details
Total words: 24,688
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles24.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.1% 12.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst