Topic summary
49% 2 analyzed articles/videos 556 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Awards Season results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 181 hits . Analysis detected 1,450 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,224 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 60% (9,816 of 24,545 topics). This Awards Season is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group. Awards Season
Topic details
Total words: 2,224
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Special Pleading: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst