Topic summary
91% 20 analyzed articles/videos 8,619 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Antitrust results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 3,857 hits . Analysis detected 38,949 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,341 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 36% (15,862 of 24,545 topics). This Antitrust is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. Antitrust
Topic details
Total words: 38,341
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score20 analyzed articles38.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst