Topic summary
96% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,273 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Startups results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 987 hits . Analysis detected 7,365 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,092 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 76% (5,912 of 23,979 topics). This Ai Startups is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group. Ai Startups
Topic details
Total words: 5,092
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.3% percentile 3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.5% 13.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst