Topic summary
⁠85%5 analyzed articles/videos1,350 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Integration results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 1,285 hits. Analysis detected 10,048 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,412 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (8,341 of 24,439 topics). This Ai Integration is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Ai Integration

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.3%15.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.6%11.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.4%9.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos