Topic summary
⁠97%2 analyzed articles/videos1,352 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai In Finance results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 810 hits. Analysis detected 7,131 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,576 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (5,917 of 23,727 topics). This Ai In Finance is worse (more manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group.
Ai In Finance
Topic details
Total words: 4,576
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.1% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 17.0%17.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.7%17.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos