Topic summary
64%4 analyzed articles/videos4,870 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abuse Of Power results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 3,229 hits. Analysis detected 21,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,996 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 41% (13,330 of 22,527 topics). This Abuse Of Power is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Abuse Of Power
Topic details
Total words: 20,996
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles21K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.9%12.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.0%6.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate