Topic summary
⁠89%3 analyzed articles/videos2,596 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abortion Policy results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 2,489 hits. Analysis detected 13,907 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,721 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (7,056 of 23,734 topics). This Abortion Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Abortion Policy
Topic details
Total words: 8,721
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.3% percentile
3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 12.5%12.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.9%13.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 28.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos