Topic summary
⁠77%3 analyzed articles/videos2,135 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abortion Pills results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 892 hits. Analysis detected 9,147 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,540 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (9,857 of 24,568 topics). This Abortion Pills is worse (more manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Abortion Pills
Topic details
Total words: 8,540
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510059.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos