Topic summary
⁠45%3 analyzed articles/videos2,664 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 911 Call results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 1,225 hits. Analysis detected 6,512 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,656 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (15,601 of 23,894 topics). This 911 Call is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.5%11.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos